自我跛足策略之動機目標及與自利歸因偏見之關係

dc.contributor.author李介至zh_tw
dc.contributor.author邱紹一zh_tw
dc.contributor.author梁滄郎zh_tw
dc.contributor.author李惠玲zh_tw
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-27T15:50:37Z
dc.date.available2014-10-27T15:50:37Z
dc.date.issued2009-02-??zh_TW
dc.description.abstract本研究根據自我價值理論建構一個包含動機目標、自我跛足策略、歸因型態及學習適應等變項之研究模式,並以競爭模式比較、徑路分析及多重樣本分析考驗自我跛足策略之動機目標,以及是否透過自利歸因現象以保護自我能力價值。本研究共抽取562名技職學生,經施測知覺工具性量表、逃避表現目標量表、自我跛足量表、歸因型態量表及學習適應量表等量表後,研究結果顯示:一、自我跛足策略在成就評價後以能力歸因模式較具有競爭性及簡約性。二、本研究所建構之動機目標、自我跛足策略、能力歸因及學習適應之模型具有理想適配度。三、高/低成就知覺者的研究模型並不等同,低成就知覺者易以自利歸因偏見保護自我能力價值受到損害。本研究並根據研究結果提出建議。zh_tw
dc.description.abstractAccording to Covington's self-worth theory, this study attempted to build a model of cognitive factors, self-handicapping, attribution styles, and learning adjustment. Data were collected from 562 students and analyzed by structural equation modeling and simultaneous analysis of several groups. The results of this study were as follows: (1) The ability attribution model had more competitive than effort or luck attribution model. (2) The research model fitted the observed data well. (3) For high/low achievement perceptive groups, low achievement perceptive groups preferred self-attribution bias to protect self-worth. Implications for theory, practice and research are discussed.en_US
dc.identifier4D602466-4632-0DCD-0B6C-FD94A2073AA8zh_TW
dc.identifier.urihttp://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/handle/20.500.12235/30455
dc.language中文zh_TW
dc.publisher國立台灣師範大學工業教育學系zh_tw
dc.publisherDepartment of Industrial Education, NTNUen_US
dc.relation2(3),53-78zh_TW
dc.relation.ispartof技術及職業教育學報zh_tw
dc.subject.other技職學生zh_tw
dc.subject.other逃避表現目標zh_tw
dc.subject.other未來目標zh_tw
dc.subject.other自我跛足策略zh_tw
dc.subject.other歸因型態zh_tw
dc.subject.other學習適應zh_tw
dc.subject.otherAttribution stylesen_US
dc.subject.otherVocational studenten_US
dc.subject.otherFuture goalen_US
dc.subject.otherPerformance-avoiding goalen_US
dc.subject.otherSelf-handicappingen_US
dc.subject.otherLearning adjustmenten_US
dc.title自我跛足策略之動機目標及與自利歸因偏見之關係zh-tw
dc.title.alternativeAnalyzing the Equality of Self-handicap and Self- attribution Bias in High/Low Achievement Groupszh_tw

Files