科學桌上遊戲量表開發與效化

Abstract

本研究旨在研發科學桌遊量表，探討科學桌遊本身的本質要素，了解不同 科學桌遊的設計要素。藉由參與者填答量表的結果，希望幫助科學桌遊設計 者，檢視此桌遊涵蓋的科學因素和遊戲因素的比重，藉此做桌遊的修正和調 整。此量表之科學因素根據 108 課綱，以科學素養為主軸，分為「核心目的」 與「科學內涵(內容、探究、態度)」，遊戲因素則以桌遊設計時的基本要素 分為「情境目標」與「操作資訊」，共四面向。整份問卷共 33 題，信度 (Cronbach’s α)為 0.942。 正式施測共 144 份有效問卷，研究對象為高中生和國中生，運用三款科學 桌遊(食在好時、瘋水輪流轉、漫遊太陽系)分別對不同班級進行施測，研究 結果顯示:三款遊戲之四面向:核心目的、科學內涵、情境目標、操作資訊平 均值皆達 3 以上(滿分為 5 分)。顯示此三款桌遊之科學元素和遊戲元素皆設計 良好，其中也對各款遊戲的科學因素和遊戲因素比重做長條圖，也對男女生的 質性資料作比較，並且在最後結果討論給予設計者建議，強化其在桌遊設計各 面向的安排與調整。未來此量表也能運用在各種不同的科學桌遊，以利桌遊設 計者改良桌遊之各項元素設計。

The purpose of this research is to develop a scientific board game scale, explore the essential elements of the scientific board game itself, and understand the design elements of different scientific board games. Through the results of the participants filling in the questionnaire, hoping to help the scientific board game designer to review the proportion of scientific factors and game factors covered by this board game, so as to make corrections and adjustments of the board game. The scientific factors of this scale are divided into "core purpose" and "scientific connotation (content, inquiry, attitude)" based on 108 syllabuses(Master Framework for the 12- year Basic Education Curriculum Guidelines), with scientific literacy as the main axis, and game factors are divided into basic elements in the design of board games. "Situational objectives" and "operational information" are four aspects. The entire questionnaire has 33 questions, and the reliability (Cronbach’s α) is 0.942. A total of 144 valid questionnaires were formally tested. The research subjects were high school students and junior high school students. Three scientific board games (good eating、crazy water、solar system travel) were used to test different classes. The research results show that: The average of the fourth aspect of the three games, core purpose, scientific connotation, situational objectives, and operational information, are all above 3 (full score is 5 points). It shows that the scientific elements and game elements of the three board games are well designed. Among them, a bar chart is made of the scientific factors and the proportion of game factors of each game. The qualitative data of boys and girls are also compared, and the final results are discussed. Give designers advice to strengthen their arrangements and adjustments in all aspects of board game design. In the future, this scale can also be used in various scientific board games to facilitate the design of various elements of board games by board game designers.